Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Maxime Janvier Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Nov at 08:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs M. Janvier

HKG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 0 Janvier
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 and Maxime Janvier winning 0. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Maxime Janvier was at the Taipei Challenger, 07-11-2025, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wong | 1 |
| Janvier | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Taipei Challenger(11-07-25)
C. L. C. Wong vs M. Janvier H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $538,970 | Career Prize Money | $258,145 |
| 55.78% (164-130) | Career Total W/L | 49.94% (391-392) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 45.45% (5-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. L. C. Wong vs M. Janvier Match Preview:
- Chak Lam Coleman Wong's second serve points won stands at 46.57%, marginally lower than Maxime Janvier's 47.29%. Could Janvier's slight edge here be decisive?
- On return games, Janvier again leads with 47.29% of second serve return points won, topping Wong's 45.20%.
- When returning first serves, Janvier performs better with a 25.17% success rate compared to Wong’s 23.26%.
- Under pressure, Janvier has a slight advantage, saving 53.79% of breakpoints versus Wong’s 52.70%.
- Over the past year, Wong has a higher match win percentage at 51.52%, compared to Janvier’s 44.78%. Will Wong’s overall consistency give him an edge?
- Wong excels on Hard courts with a 59% win rate; Janvier prefers Clay with the same winning percentage. How might surface affect this matchup?
- At the Challengers/ITF level, Wong has been more successful, winning 55% of matches, exceeding Janvier's 41.51% success rate.
- Wong has faced higher-ranked opponents on average (rank 202.7) than Janvier (rank 361.01) over the past year. Can this experience make a difference?
- In deciding sets, Janvier has a slight advantage, winning 47% compared to Wong’s 43%.
- Current event performance should be considered if matches have already been played by either player, potentially indicating who is in better form.
Editorial Prediction (November 7, 2025, UTC):
As Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Maxime Janvier prepare to face off, Wong holds a slight overall performance edge, having won a higher percentage of his matches over the past year and facing stronger opponents on average.
While Janvier has slightly better second serve and return game stats, Wong’s tendency to perform under diverse conditions and his stronger performance at the Challengers/ITF level could be crucial.
Considering the analysis, Chak Lam Coleman Wong appears likely to clinch victory in the upcoming match, although Janvier's minor statistical advantages in certain areas make this a closely contested encounter.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Maxime Janvier Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. L. C. Wong vs M. Janvier H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:3:32 | Average Match Time | 1:3:32 |
| 49% (25/51) | 1st Serve % | 60% (32/53) |
| 92% (23/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (23/32) |
| 65% (17/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (14/21) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 30% (16/53) | Return Points Win % | 22% (11/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played
M. Janvier Recent Matches Played

C. L. C. Wong vs M. Janvier Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.78% (164/130) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.94% (391/392) |
| 54.07% (372/316) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.46% (923/906) |
| 51.16% (3419/3264) | Games Win/Loss | 51.15% (9067/8661) |
| 58.90% (129/90) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.78% (98/95) |
| 46.51% (20/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.17% (196/187) |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.97% (93/105) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1687 | Aces Total | 3095 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 603 | Total Double Faults | 2428 |
| 1:31:40 | Average Match Time | 1:21:51 |
| 367.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 483.73 |
| 60% (11331/18739) | 1st Serve % | 60% (28013/46416) |
| 71% (8054/11331) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (20085/28013) |
| 49% (3631/7408) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (9079/18403) |
| 41% (703/1718) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1574/3991) |
| 38% (7230/18830) | Return Points Win % | 37% (17345/46700) |
| 53.33% (8/7) | Slam W/L | 40.63% (13/19) |
| 46.67% (7/8) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 27.27% (3/8) | Main Tour W/L | 25.81% (8/23) |
| 55.65% (69/55) | Challenger W/L | 44.77% (227/280) |
| 59.50% (72/49) | Futures W/L | 67.77% (143/68) |
| 55% (157/286) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (385/767) |
| 83% (5/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 55% (56/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (140/313) |
| 54% (51/94) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (124/269) |
| 87% (157/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (418/339) |
| 13% (157/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (418/78) |
| 20% (137/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (364/51) |